Skip to main content

[NEWS] Ukraine Passes Deal Under Hail of Eggs

April 27, 2010

Ukraine Passes Deal Under Hail of Eggs

MOSCOW — Lawmakers pelted the podium with eggs and catcalls before stalking across the aisle, putting their colleagues in headlocks and engaging in other tactics not exactly covered by Robert’s Rules of Order. Smoke bombs were set off in the chamber. Glue was poured into voting machines. The legislative leader directed the session behind umbrellas held by his aides, to protect him from projectiles.
Ukraine’s Parliament was supposed to conduct a weighty debate on Tuesday revolving around the country’s sovereignty and relationship with neighboring Russia, but the proceedings often seemed more like a food fight in a high school cafeteria.
At issue was whether to ratify an agreement to extend the lease on a Russian naval base on the Crimean Peninsula in Ukraine by 25 years. In the end, it was narrowly approved, with 236 votes out of a possible 450, but not before the Parliament appeared to do some damage to its own reputation. The two sides even got into a shoving match and tug-of-war over a giant Ukrainian flag.
Ukrainian politics are contentious, and the Parliament is often rowdy. Even so, Tuesday’s session was exceptional, offering a glimpse of the raw emotions surrounding thecountry’s divisive relations with Russia.
Ukraine, about evenly divided between its Europe-leaning west and its Russian-leaning east, has in recent years become a flashpoint in the struggle between the West and Russia for influence in the countries of the former Soviet Union. And for many Ukrainians, the naval base has been a symbol, for better or worse, of the Russian role in the country.
The base deal was negotiated last week by the new Ukrainian president, Viktor F. Yanukovich, who was elected in February on a pledge to patch relations with Russia that had been severely strained under the previous president, Viktor A. Yushchenko. In return, Russia agreed to the cost of natural gas by 30 percent.
The current lease expires in 2017, and the base’s opponents said Russia should withdraw after that. Moscow has headquartered its Black Sea Fleet there since czarist times. Mr. Yanukovich said the reduction in gas prices would bolster Ukraine’s sagging economy and help it meet its obligations to the International Monetary Fund.
His opponents gathered thousands of protesters in front of the Parliament before the vote on Tuesday. “Ukraine has begun to lose its independence," said Yulia V. Tymoshenko, a former prime minister who lost the presidential race to Mr. Yanukovich.
Besides addressing the lease on the naval base, Mr. Yanukovich took another step on Tuesday toward soothing tensions with Russia by disavowing his predecessor’s stance on the famine in the early 1930’s that killed millions of people in Ukraine.
Mr. Yushchenko, who was a strident critic of Moscow, had labeled the deaths a genocide against the Ukrainian people that was authorized by Stalin in an effort to weaken Ukraine and ensure that it would remain under Soviet authority. Russia has assailed that view, saying that people across the Soviet Union died in the famine, not only those in Ukraine.
In comments on Tuesday in Strasbourg, France, where he was visiting European diplomats, Mr. Yanukovich said he did not believe that the famine was a genocide against the Ukrainian people.
“The famine occurred in Ukraine, in Russia, in Belarus, Kazakhstan — it was a consequence of the Stalinist totalitarian regime,” Mr. Yanukovich said. “But to recognize the famine as a fact of genocide in relation to one or another nation, we consider that incorrect and unfair.”
Once considered a resolute Moscow loyalist, Mr. Yanukovich had enunciated a more nuanced position during the presidential campaign, saying that Ukraine should be nonaligned and act as a bridge between Russia and Europe. But his stance on the famine is likely to further inflame political passions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

[INTERESTS] Infographic: The Ten Most Expensive Pieces of Art Ever Sold

Infographic: The Ten Most Expensive Pieces of Art Ever Sold By Cliff Kuang Last week, a mysterious rich man paid $104.3 million [1] for a six-foot tall sculpture by Alberto Giacometti, making it the most expensive piece of art ever sold. Following that news, GOOD and graphic-design firm Karlssonwilker [2] created an infographic of the ten most expensive pieces of art of all time. (Full-size here [3].) (The title, Not-So-Starving Artists, is deceiving because it's hard to starve if you're all dead. The real lucre goes to Christie's and Sotheby's, the two major auction houses.) Obviously, the graph is a schematic, but here's the actual works, if you're curious to learn more: 1.Walking Man I by Alberto Giacommeti--$104.3 million 2.Boy with a Pipe by Pablo Picasso--$104.1 million 3.Dora Maar with Cat by Pablo Picasso--$95.2 million 4.Adele Bloch Bauer II by Gustav Klimt--$88 million 5.Triptych, 1976 by Francis Bacon--$86.3 million 6.Portrait du Dr G...

[NEWS] Chocolate Bond

British high-end chocolate maker and retailer  Hotel Chocolat , which currently operates over 40 stores in the UK, the Middle East and the US, wants to expand even further. But rather than turning to banks or big investors for money, they're inviting customer to buy bonds. Bonds that will pay chocolate returns. Two values of Chocolate Bond will be issued: both with the return paid in monthly Tasting Boxes. Holders of a GBP 2,000 Chocolate Bond will receive six free tasting boxes a year worth GBP 107.70 per year, and those holding a GBP 4,000 bond will receive thirteen boxes, worth GBP 233.35 per year. Which comes down to a 5.38% return. After an initial term of three years, and on every anniversary thereafter, bond holders can redeem their bond for a full return of their investment. If they decide to continue to hold the bond, the monthly boxes will keep on coming. The company doesn't have to worry about the logistics of interest payment in kind; it already operates a tasting...

[INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS] Venezuela plotted to kill Colombia president, Spain judge says

Venezuela plotted to kill Colombia president, Spain judge says A Spanish judge on Monday charged that Venezuela plotted to kill Colombia President Álvaro Uribe, collaborating with rebel groups ETA and FARC to kill other political officials as well. Colombia's president, Álvaro Uribe (l.), shook hands with Venezuela's president, Hugo Chávez (r.), as the Dominican Republic's president, Leonel Fernandez, looked on during the Rio Group Summit in Santo Domingo, in this March 2008 file photo. (Miraflores Press Office/AP/File)   By Tom A. Peter Correspondent posted March 2, 2010 at 8:14 am EST • A daily summary of global reports on security issues. A diplomatic row has erupted between Spain and Venezuela after a Spanish judge accused officials in Caracas of plotting with rebel groups to kill Colombian President Álvaro Uribe and other political officials. Spanish National Court Judge Eloy Velasco charged on Monday that the government of Hugo Chávez had been working as...