Skip to main content

[POLITICAL ECONOMIC NEWS]Warren Buffett's likely successor: Chinese Tiananmen protestor, hedge fund manager


Warren Buffett's likely successor: Chinese Tiananmen protestor, hedge fund manager

Who will succeed billionaire super-investor Warren Buffett when the 79-year-old Oracle of Omaha finally retires as chairman of his Berkshire Hathaway holding company?
Perhaps no question in global finance has preoccupied investors like this one in recent years.
The answer, at least according to Friday's Wall Street Journal, appears to be a 44-year-old Chinese hedge fund manager who participated in the deadly Tiananmen Square protests 20 years ago named Li Lu.
Li was taken from his parents in China when they were sent through Mao's brutal Cultural Revolution re-education process, which set China back decades and was responsible for more than 1 million deaths.
He became a student activist and took part in the Tianamen Square resistance, in which as many as 7,000 Chinese were killed by their own government, according to NATO intelligence.
Afterward, Li left for France and later came to the United States, where he was hailed as a human rights hero. He gained admission toColumbia University, despite speaking little English, and earned degrees in economics, law and business.
He saw Buffett speak at Columbia in 1993 and became inspired to start trading stocks, which led to a Wall Street job. By 1997, he had set up his first hedge fund.
Li got to know Buffett via one of his human-rights contacts -- Jane Olsen, wife of a Berkshire director. In 2003, Li met Charlie Munger, Buffett's right hand man and, according to the Journal, "made an immediate impression." Li began investing for Munger and, in 2002, discovered BYD, a Chinese maker of lithium batteries, which power everything from iPhones to the new Volt electric car.
Li, Buffett and Berkshire bought into BYD, and Berkshire's $230 million investment is now worth $1.5 billion.
That said, the Journal points out, BYD is Li's one big home run, which sort of makes him the Alan Dershowitz/Bucky Dent of investing. The rest of Li's ideas have been singles and doubles.
But Li thinks like Buffett: Buy stocks in companies you believe in and understand, and hold onto them. Berkshire Hathaway/Buffett own or own stakes in Geico, Coca-Cola, Burlington Northern Santa Ferailroad, Dairy Queen, Mars candy, and others.
Picking a Chinese investor makes perfect sense for Buffett, who knows where the future is and who is, for all his pro-America proselytizing, intensely pragmatic. Even though Li does not have unlimited travel in communist China, he knows China; Buffett knows China is key to the world's economic future; and the Chinese government may change.
Disclosure: Buffett is a director of The Washington Post Co.
By Frank Ahrens  |  July 30, 2010; 6:41 PM ET
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/political-economy/2010/07/warren_buffetts_likely_success.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

[My Opinion] TOYOTA

Toyota temporarily halts sales of eight models The carmaker took the unprecedented action because the vehicles' gas pedals can get stuck and cause unwanted acceleration. Toyota will also stop making the cars and trucks Monday. http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-toyota-sales27-2010jan27,0,5888108,full.story According to press reports, the German automobile company, Volkswagen is likely to take an opportunity which may conquer the automobile field. In the bottom line, TOYOTA company seems to be frustrated by the makeshift way of management. In my personal view, I feel so sorry and sad. Whatever else might be said, TOYOTA is the main company in terms of automobile business. Success comes and gone. I hope TOYOTA will be reformed by this bitter lesson.
Post a Comment
Read more

[ENVIRONMENT] Big Food vw. Big Insurance

Big Food vs. Big Insurance By MICHAEL POLLANPublished: September 9, 2009 TO listen to President Obama’s speech on Wednesday night, or to just about anyone else in the health care debate, you would think that the biggest problem with health care in America is the system itself — perverse incentives, inefficiencies, unnecessary tests and procedures, lack of competition, and greed. No one disputes that the $2.3 trillion we devote to the health care industry is often spent unwisely, but the fact that the United States spends twice as much per person as most European countries on health care can be substantially explained, as a study released last month says, by our being fatter. Even the most efficient health care system that the administration could hope to devise would still confront a rising tide of chronic disease linked to diet. That’s why our success in bringing health care costs under control ultimately depends on whether Washington can summon the political will to take on ...
3 comments
Read more